| June 23, 2002 | Los Angeles Times
The Contrarians
by Russ Baker
Something has happened to American
journalism. Within the increasingly corporate corridors of newspapers
today, depressingly few editors or reporters stand out for doing things
differently. There are good and legitimate reasons why news-people are
encouraged to excel only within conventional bounds (ownership, finances,
public perceptions, presumed neutrality). But there are equally good
reasons (often the very same ones) for celebrating freethinkers and
mavericks. As annoying as they might be, as much as they make the suits
nervous, these oddballs infuse journalism with a feistiness, a
cantankerousness, a sense of outrage and a sense of fun. They also play a
critical role in keeping the body politic healthy--or trying to make it
so.
Two new memoirs from notable journalists demonstrate the range of
rebelliousness. Jim Bellows, author of "The Last Editor: How I Saved the
New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Los Angeles Times from
Dullness and Complacency," is a coat-and-tie man nevertheless dedicated to
impish irreverence. Jack Newfield, author of "Somebody's Gotta Tell It:
The Upbeat Memoir of a Working-Class Journalist," is a crusading outsider,
a New York poor boy with conflicting urges: a passion for attacking the
citadel and a not-so-secret hankering for a place at the table.
Bellows got his start on a small daily deep in Ku Klux Klan territory and
quickly became a legend in big-city newsrooms, keeping alive feisty,
second-ranked newspapers by revitalizing their writing. Newfield made his
name during the heyday of the definitive alternative weekly, the Village
Voice, then became a muckraking columnist for two of New York's daily
tabloids. Both men's commitment to productive troublemaking emerged from
childhoods in which they were, literally or metaphorically, the little
guy. Newfield's career arc owes much to the lingering insecurity of an
only-child, fatherless youth; Bellows' stems from the pressures of being
just 5 feet tall as a high school senior (before sprouting in college).
During his six decades in journalism, the laconic Bellows has stayed
quietly behind the scenes while fostering innovation and nurturing some of
the country's finest writers. Everywhere he went, he challenged his
charges to take the kind of risks that create a stir. At the New York
Herald Tribune, he boosted such unknowns as Jimmy Breslin, Tom Wolfe, Dick
Schaap and Judith Crist, and he encouraged sportswriter Red Smith to
stretch his considerable talent. Out of the Bellows-inspired ferment at
the Trib came the personal, in-your-face dynamism of the "new
journalism"--and the idea that newswriting could uplift, transform and
amuse.
"[P]eople would ask me: How do you get all this high-powered talent? How
do you get them all singing on the same page? How does such a
self-effacing guy do it? But that's the very thing that did it." If
Bellows' book has a flaw, it is that he stuffs his memoir with too many
other voices, in the form of boxed remembrances, compliments and
commentary. But even here, the inclusion of some barbed criticism of his
career ultimately serves to make him more likable.
Bellows probably did more than any other person to improve some of
America's biggest newspapers. Not by working for them, but against them.
"The 'second paper' in town has usually been my home," he writes. "Second
papers have more excitement than number one. Easy Street is not a good
address for innovation."
While the Washington Post was perfecting its mix of investigative
reporting and insider political coverage in the 1970s, Bellows was at the
Washington Star, puncturing the Post's pomposity. He started a fearless
and funny gossip column, the Ear, assigned an ahead-of-its-time piece on
gay athletes and aggressively recruited and promoted minorities and women
(including Diane K. Shah, one of the first female sports columnists, and
Mary Anne Dolan, who succeeded him at the Los Angeles Herald Examiner,
becoming the first woman at the helm of a large
daily.)
His one fling with a market leader, editing soft news under the Los
Angeles Times' Nick Williams in the 1960s, was a disappointment. Trying to
inject an edge into a complacent paper, he ran afoul of entrenched
interests and attitudes. "[T]oo many oxes are gored ... too many segments
of our middle-class audience are offended," Williams cautioned Bellows
about his refashioned of The Times' then-magazine, West. "We have GOT to
watch the mix. We have GOT to avoid over-sophistication .... This is NOT a
national mag." And, when an article noted few differences among local
supermarket prices, Williams cautioned, "One thing you've got to hammer
into the heads of ALL 'West' staffers--never KNOCK an advertiser, even
gently."
Beginning in the early 1980s, Bellows, never fearful of something new,
helped launch the precocious online service Prodigy, worked in television
and collaborated with the twenty something creators of the search engine
Excite. Shy but not retiring, the octogenarian has just been named editor
of a nascent glossy political magazine, "Common Good."
A master of understatement and dry wit who readily admits that his memoirs
benefited from the attentions of a talented writer, Gerald Gardner,
Bellows champions what might be called newsprint sensibility in an age of
multimedia ephemera and distraction. He deplores the waves of
consolidation that have left most American cities with just one
chain-owned newspaper. In the end, most of the papers he worked at did
vanish, but not before leaving their imprint on their larger competitors.
His rivals appropriated many of Bellows' innovations, recruited his stars
and became feistier and livelier for having battled the man for readers.
In his memoir, Bellows contextualizes a professional life well-lived, and
he is loath to leave out relevant details, including an affair that ended
the first of his three marriages and the unsuccessful cancer battle that
ended the second, happier union.
Jack Newfield, by comparison, warns us that some subjects are off limits.
"Intimate public confession is not my temperament," he writes. Instead,
Newfield offers us a familiar story with a twist. A Jewish boy grows up a
fatherless only child in a predominantly black neighborhood. His love for
the underdog Brooklyn Dodgers and their color-barrier-breaking star Jackie
Robinson grows into a lifelong commitment to equality and an equally
strong contempt for all abusers of power.
Being the right person at the right place and time, Newfield becomes Herr
Zeitgeist, vividly taking us through the great liberal causes of the last
half-century: civil rights, the antiwar movement, power struggles at the
Village Voice, encounters with the mob, New York City government
corruption and, later, newspaper strikes and upheavals at the New York
Daily News and the New York Post. A classic practitioner of advocacy
journalism, simultaneously writing about and participating in the politics
and movements of his time, Newfield apprenticed himself to or befriended
many seminal figures, from the father of Democratic Socialism, Michael
Harrington, to Robert F. Kennedy. He's a guy's guy reporter, getting close
to some of the boxing greats, rousting crooked politicians and incompetent
judges.
Much of the book is an effort to explain what those turbulent decades
meant. Though Newfield skirts deep insights, he offers compelling witness
to key historical events, such as Robert F. Kennedy's transformation from
political infighter to a social reformer, a makeover in which Newfield
played a prominent role. Newfield casts Kennedy as an authentically reborn
man, but there are also revealing asides: "When I told Kennedy that
McCarthy was going to run, he replied, 'I don't believe it. He is not that
sort of fellow. And if he does run, it will be to increase his lecture
fees.' "
Among the better fly-on-the-wall moments is a previously unreported 1977
incident when New York City mayoral candidate and future governor Mario
Cuomo, who would develop a reputation for introspection and thoughtful
oratory, punched out a conservative activist. Newfield was also on hand to
witness some reckless acting-out by a young Tom Hayden: "[McCarthy
speechwriter] Jeremy [Larner] said something that Tom disagreed with, and
Tom suddenly lunged at Jeremy with chopsticks, trying to gouge his eyes
out." More than once, Newfield was swept up emotionally in the moment: "I
threw a typewriter out the window of the [Chicago] Hilton Hotel, at the
police, when I saw kids getting beaten."
Newfield virtually brags about his lack of professional distance,
gleefully displaying his many hats. "I could balance these rather obvious
conflicts of interest only because I was working for a paper like the
Voice, which specialized in personal advocacy reporting and made no
pretense of objectivity. It defined itself as a corrective to the
mainstream media and a forum for personal experiences, honestly
described."
Newfield possesses what the uniquely elegant newsman Murray Kempton called
"losing side consciousness." His pamphleteering and journalistic sleuthing
accomplished much good, changing the lives of some of society's least
privileged members, from lead paint victims to abused nursing home
residents. While lending an ear to the chronically unheard, he went
ferociously after some formidable foes, including the seemingly
never-ending supply of corrupt New York City officials. His trademark "New
York's Ten Worst Judges" feature was a landmark in the fight for
accountability. But as in some of his journalistic crusades, his memoir is
marred by sloppy delivery, including hopscotch chronology, a propensity
for lists of names that mean nothing to us and embarrassing misspellings.
Newfield, an angry man who has trouble separating his journalistic mission
from the personal demons to which he will only allude, writes in a style
far better suited to a column than a book.
Throughout, his pleasure in knowing the powerful is plain. He quotes his
close friend Cuomo's opinion that "Jack Newfield is one of the great
columnists in the country." Nevertheless, it appears that Newfield is not
a contented man. Speaking of the much-loved Kempton, he confesses: "I
envied Murray's forgiving nature and always suspected he knew something I
did not."
His exploration of his lifelong passion for boxing is a typical mix of
riveting firsthand reporting, indifferent writing and inadequate analysis.
He tells some good boxing stories, but scants key episodes, including his
ongoing feud with boxing promoter Don King. Here is his defense of a sport
that he readily concedes exploits poor black men and often leaves its
practitioners drooling half-wits: "Boxing is--and has always been--a
corrupt, brutal and unfair sport ... [but] it is too deep in our blood to
be abolished.... I view boxing through an economic populist lens and try
to apply the values of equity, workplace safety, government regulation,
and unionism to the sports slum of sad endings." Once or twice, he lets
his guard down: "Boxing taught me that it was not unmanly to feel fear."
Imperfections notwithstanding, Newfield and Bellows represent two kinds of
courageous journalistic voices, and their careers remind us of the
importance of protecting a diverse range of opinion and style. "As the
voices diminish in number," Bellows writes near the end of his book, "our
lives are diminished, too."
|