Russ
Baker —an investigative reporter and essayist—is
a longtime TomPaine.com
contributor. He is involved in the development of a new
not-for-profit organization dedicated to revitalizing
investigative journalism in America.
How much of a pipe dream is it to be an
effective “media reform activist?” Most of us are
skeptical about real opportunities for mere mortals to do
anything to stanch the flow of life from an increasingly
sold-out, wimpy, self-censoring, corporate-owned fourth
estate.
Now, I don’t want to come off as excessively starry-eyed.
But I’ll tell you this: I wasn’t the only one attending the
National Conference on Media Reform last weekend in St. Louis
who was impressed, energized, made to see what is now possible
in terms of reclaiming our right to read and hear the truth.
So were the 2,500 other attendees. So were the hundreds or
perhaps thousands more who wanted to come, were there ample
space to accommodate everyone. So were participants
Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein— the two
holdouts on the Federal Communications Commission who still
believe in a vigorous, diverse press. And so was Bill Moyers,
the poster boy for a conservative campaign to neuter public
broadcasting, who capped the proceedings with a
rousing call to arms .
Pretty much everyone was begoshed to find that so many
other people care about such dry-sounding and technical
matters as media monopolies, censorship at the Corporation for
Public Broadcasting, affordable and unfettered Internet access
and strategies for funding independent journalism.
I usually can’t stand such conferences, and I’ve attended
plenty. Lots of blather but little concrete to show for
it. However, this one—organized by the
group FreePress (co-founded by
Robert McChesney and John
Nichols)— was singular. Attendance was dramatically
up over previous conclaves, and everyone, it seemed, had
success stories from the media wars. Which suggests this
rather elementary formulation: If you can get enough people
doing lots of different things on an issue that has
traditionally eluded popular appeal or public scrutiny,
everything can change.
Here are just a few of the things you can affect as an
individual:
What’s on television. Cable
companies set the menu for what you can watch in your city,
but every few years, cable franchise licenses come up for
renewal. And at that time, you can help persuade your local
government to require those companies to reconsider what kinds
of programs they carry, and to expand the diversity and value
of their offerings. One way is to increase the number
of public access channels. For more on
this, contact Alliance for Community Media .
What’s on the radio. A huge chunk of the
programming going over the airwaves is now determined by a
handful of executives at companies like Clear Channel, owner
and operator of more than 1,200 stations. So you can help
support and promote the growing number of alternatives, which
include locally owned and run stations, Pacifica, Air America,
Internet radio, podcasts, and, notably, community-run
“low-power FM” stations—which, facing severe
obstacles, now appear poised to emerge in a bigger way, thanks
to the Local Community Radio Act of 2005, from Senators John
McCain, R-Ariz., Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Maria Cantwell,
D-Wash. As noted recently by the Utne Reader , “the
bill would expand LPFM service nationwide, easing the burden
on would-be LPFM stations to prove noninterference with
commercial broadcasters.” For more on LPFM, including
information on obtaining a license, contact Prometheus Radio Project .
What’s on public broadcasting. Common
Cause, recognizing that the campaign financing system can’t be
changed unless the media are reformed—and the best
parts protected— is involved with a “Hands Off NPR
and PBS” campaign. You can find out about it here .
The creep of commercialism in your
community. To learn more about what’s wrong with
Channel One, the providers of advertising-soaked “news”
programming to a captive audience of 8 million students in
12,000 schools across America, read my articles from The New Republic and The American Prospect. Then
contact Commercial Alert to find out what you
can do about it.
FCC Decision-making. The FCC must ask for
and acknowledge public comment, but hardly ever hears from
anyone but corporations. Recently, large numbers of citizens
have begun exercising their right to be heard, and the rising
chorus seems to be making a demonstrable difference in FCC
deliberations. To get started, go here .
Local coverage. Monitor your area media
and, when you see something wrong, speak out. Many attendees
had stories of getting results from their own newspaper, radio
and TV stations when they complained about bias, poor
journalism and tepidness. One woman from an extremely
conservative part of Florida happily recounted how she had
single-handedly muscled key advertisers into withdrawing
support from one hate-mongering program.
Support the good media that are out there, or
create your own. Independent newspapers, blogs,
podcasts— there’s a thriving marketplace of ideas out
there, if you look just a bit. And a cornucopia of groups are
bringing democracy to media. Go to http://www.freepress.net/content/orgs
for a list of 149 organizations working in various aspects of
media reform. Choose your favorite area. And dive in.
Remind the “old media” folks that they’re becoming
dinosaurs not just for economic and technological
reasons. They've forgotten how to do real journalism
anymore, so busy are they establishing their 'fairness' by
giving equal time to credible information served up in the
public interest and to blatant lies, and by lowering the
barrier to fluff. Bill Moyers’ trademark maxim nails it:
“News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else
is publicity.”
And there's a nice counter-maxim. Publicity—in the
form of concerted public action—is in fact an
antidote, the best way to coax that "real news" out of
hiding.